Content: S19-519.docx (15.10 KB)
Uploaded: 16.01.2020

Positive responses: 0
Negative responses: 0

Sold: 0
Refunds: 0

$0.2
The city administration appealed to the arbitration court with a statement declaring the order of the antimonopoly authority to annul the decision of the head of the administration invalid.
The antimonopoly authority stated that the plaintiff missed the statutory 6-month period for appeal.
The arbitral tribunal refused the city administration to satisfy the stated claim due to the expiration of the period for applying to the court.
Considering such a decision illegal, the administration appealed to the court of appeal. At the same time, she referred to the need to apply the 3-year limitation period established by Article 196 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, since invalidating a non-normative act of a state body is a way of protecting civil rights.
Are there grounds for canceling the decision of the arbitral tribunal?
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet

Similar items